Saturday, September 27, 2014

Training or Trauma ?!?

Many of us have been on what are collectively known as Large Group Awareness Training courses (LGATs). Often they are about 2-3 days long and are all about personal development and changing lives for the better. About 10 years ago I myself went on one of these courses called _______ . I was recently doing some research about Pyramid Schemes and how they work and I came across a blog about LGATs and wondered if there was a link. It lead me to reading articles, blog posts and comments about this sort of 'human potential' education that seemed to spring from the 1970s. The opinions are very diverse and range from total admiration and devotion, to middle of the road 'use it and get out quick' comments, all the way to calling them cults and very dangerous. What is very interesting is that many commentators suggest that mind control is used in these "courses" to coerce participants to do the follow up courses, to make them volunteer their time for free and to get them to 'enrol' their friends and family members - more on that word ENROL later.
As an interesting exercise let's list some of the techniques used in mind control and then compare these to our experiences during these LGAT courses. I will relate my own experiences here too.

Firstly, what is mind control ?

Mind control (also known as brainwashing, coercive persuasion, thought control, or thought reform) is an indoctrination process which results in an inability to think independently and a disruption of beliefs and affiliations. Breaking down a mind and then implanting another reality. Allegedly the CIA are experts at this.

The headings below describe the mind control techniques and the commentary below each describes the experiences from the course.

Sleep Deprivation and Fatigue - creating disorientation and vulnerability
Each day of my course ended late so that you got home at about 10pm. You had to do about 3 hours of homework and I was so buzzed anyway that not much sleep was had before you had to be back at the venue early the next day. Lateness was severely frowned upon.

Change of Diet or Fasting - creating disorientation and increased susceptibility to emotional arousal
In my course there were no meal breaks apart from lunch. No snacks or drinks, apart from water, were allowed and breaking the rules was met with isolating comments and guilt tripping. They also played around with the temperature which switched from hot to cold throughout the day, enhancing the disorientation.

Hypnosis - inducing a high state of suggestibility, often thinly disguised as relaxation or meditation.
I remember a session at the end of the 2nd day where we all had to sit in silence, close our eyes and breath deeply whilst the Instructor softly suggested that we were afraid of the person next to us, then the whole room, whole city, whole world etc etc. Without going into detail it was a very dramatic event and people were sobbing uncontrollable as well as laughing hysterically. I just remember it being very odd and slightly disturbing.

Metacommunication - implanting subliminal messages by stressing certain key words or phrases in long, confusing lectures
My course was saturated with these 'suggestive' words within long 'conversations' as they called them. Even that word 'conversation' is subtle and suggestive isn't it. And after a few days you are using these words all the time, even with non course members which is very disconcerting for your family and friends. You are there to create 'new possibilities', your old beliefs are called 'rackets' and we needed to have a 'transformation' that allowed us to live 'powerfully'. If you look on the internet LGAT graduates use these implanted words all the time. If you have a different point of view to a convert then you are accused of submitting to a defunct way of 'being'.

Remember that word 'enrol'. Well this is the clever bit I suppose. It is 'suggested' that in order to achieve in anything you need to get people on board. The word they use is ENROL. You need to enrol people into your new way of being and new enthusiasm. To succeed in creating your new life and personality you needed to enrol people in it. Now, throughout the course you are constantly asked to sign up for new courses as well as sign up other people to do the course. The word used here is also ENROL. Enrol your family and friends and enrol on the advanced course etc etc. So they subconsciously have you link success in the course with ...... signing up others. Or, you haven't 'got it' if you don't sign up others. Your just being your old unsuccessful self if you don't sell it to others. 

This company's only source of marketing and advertising is this very very powerful, yet devious, subconscious language pattern technique. You sell their product for them and they get that service for free. Lovely.

Verbal Abuse and Finger Pointing - desensitising and destabilisation techniques
Lots of this goes on and I was singled out after I complained about the constant sessions on enrolling others to do the course. The Instructor got me out the front and after about a one hour verbal wrestling match she eventually broke me. She called me cruel, and then said I was only cruel because I cared for people. She would accuse me of something else and then pat me on the head. Twisting me up and down and around. Good cop bad cop. Destabilisation techniques basically. I remember I had half the crowd with me willing me on to confront her and express what they were also thinking. But she was an expert, very persuasive and when she broke me she also broke all my co-dissenters in the crowd at the same time. Mass suggestion - very effective.

Peer Group Pressure - suppressing doubt and resistance to new ideas by exploiting the need to belong
As the course ground on I remember we all became little puppies in the Instructor's hands. Any resistance was suppressed and often met by odd looks of astonishment and disdain from your fellow course participants. Here is what another attendee wrote:
Resistance to the curriculum was always met with more curriculum, with any attempt to debunk the material only serving to strengthen it. Sometimes fellow students got into the mix by yelling out “rackets” or some other term coined in the coursework as a response to a skeptical student’s questions. After a while, people stopped protesting altogether and started conforming just so they wouldn’t feel excluded. Group think began to settle in.

Confession
The whole 3 days was peppered with many instances of people coming to the front and sharing their weaknesses, sordid life experiences and darkest moments. This is a big part of LGAT schemes.

Rejection of Old Values
One of the main points throughout the course was that your ego is getting in the way of you progressing in life. All your problems in life and the problems you have with particular people in your life are all down to you and your ego. No arguments. That's it. All your current reasoning of your pivotal life experiences needs to be thrown out. Obviously we all need to live and learn in life and move on from destructive thought patterns. But a sledge hammer one size fits all approach to this would never work unless the above mentioned mind massage tecniques were employed.

So the question is: Are people who go on these self help courses learning profound new life changing skills, or are they being subjected to well known mental torture techniques ? Are the breakthroughs they experience enlightening epiphanies, or is this just the mind popping from sustained physical and emotional pressure ? I remember when I 'popped' late on Sunday night at home. It was like I had just taken the best drug on the planet. I thought I had just been zapped with profound insight into how the universe worked and that everything was now possible. I remember playing a game of squash the following evening and I played about 10 levels above my norm - my squash coach was dumbfounded ! It was as if I had moved into another limitless realm. 

But is that good ? You can get the same experience from taking A grade cocaine. Yet what goes up must come down. In my experience new personalities need to be worked on gradually. The leaders of these courses are experts in breaking personalities down, creating a clean slate and building up another one in about 3 days. The trouble is the new personalities are all very similar and talk the same way. The richness and diversity in people is washed away to produce wide eyed converts spouting buzz words and meaningless catch phrases. They are quintessential pyramid schemes with no labour costs as everyone is a volunteer trying to save the world. The more I think about it the more I am in awe of the robust simplicity of these pyramid enrolment arrangements intertwined within self help programs that prey on peoples natural desire to break free from mediocrity.

Looking back I am amazed at how quickly people's thinking and subsequent actions can be tailored and moulded by simple 'rough up' techniques and subconscious friendly suggestive language. There is no doubt there is good stuff in these LGAT courses, but a con man always mixes good in with the bad. In what other ways are we being mentally moulded ? What does subjecting yourself to mainstream media cause in our perception and views ? What consent does it manufacture ? But don't get me started down that track........!!

Saturday, August 23, 2014

' so you're telling me there's a chance ' !!



What's wrong with this sentence ?
"For synthesis of protein, a succession of tRNA molecules charged with their appropriate amino acids have to be brought together with an mRNA molecule and matched up by base-pairing through their anticodons with each of its successive codons. The amino acids then have to be linked together to extend the growing protein chain, and the tRNAs, relieved of their burdens, have to be released. This whole complex of processes is carried out by a giant multi molecular machine, the ribosome, formed of two main chains of RNA, called ribosomal RNAs (rRNAs), and more than 50 different proteins. This evolutionarily ancient molecular juggernaut latches onto the end of an mRNA molecule and then trundles along it capturing loaded tRNA molecules and stitching together the amino acids they carry to form a new protein chain". 
Before I give you an answer remind yourself that proteins are the building blocks of life and fit together to form the numerous parts of living organisms, including the bits that make up you. The ribosome mentioned above is a molecular machine that is found in all living cells that puts all the blocks together. It is also highly complex and its detailed workings have eluded scientists for decades.

The problem with the sentence is that it describes this highly complex and intrinsic machine as a product of evolution and that it's very very old. That is, it came about by chance and that it's like some ancient gestatory builder of life. It seems that in mainstream descriptions of living organisms, whenever something is very complex, and not understood, you just have to apply lashings of time and the word evolution ..... and boom, problem solved. There's your answer. Go with that for the time being and the gaps will be filled in later.

The 'elephant in the room' question surely is - who made the really complex and elusive ribosomes ?

You know those really complex robots that make cars ? Play some of this video :





Well the assumption in the above problematic sentence is like saying that those robots turned up one day due to random chance events. However, we know that some very clever people designed and built them in specific planned sequenced events. And those ribosomes are conservatively a million times more complex than those machines.... and are so small you can't even see them.

The other 'elephant in the room' question is how did life exist before the ribosome ? There was nothing around to assemble the parts ! And who made those equally complex atoms that make the proteins that are needed to go into the parts ?

Surely it points towards an intelligent mind. Matter can't form a mind by chance and time. It's the other way round. A mind forms matter.

To say that 'chance' is a substitute for a 'mind' is illogical, and goes against every other way we view complex designed systems. It is summed up by the following classic movie clip:


Sunday, November 24, 2013

Are We Breeding Sociopaths?


Is the concentration of sociopaths in society increasing ? Are they becoming more prevalent? Is sociopathy a defect that is heredity or is our societal trend creating more?

What identifies a sociopath? Research will reveal the following social / emotional traits. They:
  • Lack empathy and are emotionally shallow
  • Lack remorse or guilt
  • Are deceitful and manipulative
  • Lack social behavioral controls
  • Need constant excitement and lack responsibility
  • Are egocentric and grandiose, yet often charming
  • Are glib and superficial

Most of us ‘normal’ humanoids are restrained from certain anti social or potentially hurtful behaviors by a conscience. Sociopaths are not restrained by this inner social filter. The conscience gene is dampened or missing. As humans we are different from animals because we have this sophisticated inner mechanism, as apposed to animals who are guided by instinct and are more pre programmed.

Interestingly some of these sociopathic traits are shared by a generation that we often label gen-y. Here is how one commentator generalises this generation:

Selfish, arrogant, totally lacking in compassion. Self righteous attitudes, the opinion that they are better than their parents and that the world owes them everything. Some delusional belief that they should be able to walk into a job with no experience, not do anything they don't like and get paid top dollar. Maybe it's the fault of the stupid laws that stopped us beating them senseless when they were young. They seem to think they can do what they want, when they want and to hell with how much it hurts anyone else. It's a scary thought that they will eventually be responsible for the planet. God help the future.

Obviously the gen yers fight back and say that it is past generations that have caused these traits and that gen xers and baby boomers are just winging about the next generation, as generations tend to do. The banter back and forth is all over blogs and column commentaries. Individuals take is personally, but it is an overall personality change in ‘young’ people that is being noticed. Narcissists have always existed, but are they becoming more prevalent ?

I don’t think these impersonal, inhuman, animalistic traits are limited to the latest generation. I think society as a whole is taking on these ‘me first’ characteristics. If success is identified by wealth, looks and conquests then the sociopathic traits would surely be ‘attributes’. The CEO would be hampered by empathy, the big time lawyer would be stumbled by a well-tuned conscience and the media mogul, and his empire, would be held back by a magnanimous mindset.

Is there any data to suggest that these traits are on the increase? In her article ‘Is there an Epidemic of Narcissism today?’ Jean Twenge Ph.D. notes that a particular study she conducted shows that narcissistic traits are increasing ever faster. She states:

From 2002 to 2007, college students' scores on the Narcissistic Personality Inventory (NPI) rose twice as fast as we'd found in an earlier study that covered changes between 1982 and 2006.  The increase in narcissism was stronger for women than for men in both datasets. Men are still more narcissistic than women on average, but women are catching up fast. This makes some sense, as a lot of the cultural push toward narcissism has a bigger effect on girls and women.

Obviously this study just looks at one trait of a sociopath, but there are other studies to be found on other traits. I would be keen to hear of any notable ones within the comments of this blog article.

If you, like me, think that a better way to be is a ‘you first’ mindset, then you may find yourself feeling a bit like a fish out of water in modern society. Humanist traits of care, empathy and conscience seeking will not serve you well if you want to keep up and get ahead. In reality these qualities are being bred out of us and whittled away. The stats speak for themselves, regardless of what the blog wars say. Gen yers are like the latest brood from the mother world. But we can all get infected. Our consciences can be blunted !!

If you are honest you can see something is wrong with society. It’s a more sociopathic environment and it doesn’t look like changing any time soon.

Recommended Reading:
  • Without Conscience – The Disturbing World of the Psychopaths around us by Robert D. Hare
  • Sociopath World Blog by M.E. Thomas – the book looks good too!
  • The Sociopath Next Door by Martha Stout
  • The Psychopath Test by Jon Ronson
  • Snakes in Suits by Paul Babiak
  • 2 Timothy 3:1-5 in the Bible by God

Wednesday, December 12, 2012

Silver Linings













With all the downside sentiment in the industry today it might be hard to find some upside as a counter balance. The market is distinctly flat within most sectors and a recent quote from BCI Media Group stated " while supply pressures continue to build in many sectors of the market, it is highly unlikely there will be a sustainable increase in building construction in the short term'. However in the same article it did mention $17.3 billion in total construction starts for the last 3 months. Which is actually an increase of 16% from the last reported period. That is still a large amount of construction. Retail construction has also bucked the trend as large multi national companies with ready access to finance have continued to build as they fight each other for market share in the competitive retail environment.  

Positive sides to the current economic climate are most definitely evident. I recently attended the AIQS Infinite Value Awards in Melbourne at which Conduit Recruitment was a sponsor. On talking to a number of Directors of QS companies, positive views were abundant and matched the vibrant and ebullient atmosphere of the evening.  

Some positive developments and outcomes of the current challenging market within the QS Industry would include the following: 

Innovation

In a strong market lots of energy is put into sustaining growth and meeting the demand. Keeping the wheels on you could say. However in a slow market more energy is put into refining services so that the outcome is the same but is achieved at a lower fee or income. Technology is developed and office procedures are refined and manipulated. Why are these changes and innovations not made during the good times - well perhaps the focus and scrutiny are not there. These innovations are also seen within the industry at large as different building techniques are created, different materials are tried and different methodologies, perhaps suppressed in the past, are pushed to the front. The industry as a whole jumps forward and will only benefit from the changes.

Diversification & Efficiencies

Due to the slow down in building starts the QS service has had to move into other market sectors that may have not been a priority before. These would include infrastructure, mining, oil and gas, rail and logistics. These areas are not new to the QS service, but it would have to be said they have been more prominent in the service offering in the UK and Europe. They were not on the radar before and the expertise was not available and hard to secure. Now companies have had to move into these areas as a necessity as their usual income streams have slowed. Companies have opened divisions and expertise has been sort and acquired. The companies that have implemented this change will have a more rounded and complete list of services on offer moving forward and will carry these new income channels into the future. The Australian QS service has needed this diversification for a while and it was too limited to a few specialist companies. QS companies are also being asked to engage in other non traditional services such as Claims Management and Life Cycle assessments. All growth in these areas will add to companies' repertoires.  

Recruitment Rationalisations

Downsizing is not fun and is usually going in the wrong direction to the business plan! However a downturn does provide a chance to upgrade the team when talent, that may not have usually been on the market, become available. There are also major opportunities to rationalise the recruitment process. When the market is buoyant and the skill shortage is heightened, companies are more willing to pay recruitment fees for their new hires. They need staff numbers and they need them quickly. However a slow market allows companies more time to focus on cost saving strategies for their recruitment processes. These can include appointing internal recruitment consultants that have left the agency environment as well as growing their networks through social media strategies. However, it has to be said that the effectiveness of an in-house system is directly proportional to the skills and abilities of the internal recruiter. Selecting the right person is extremely important as the advantages mentioned above will be lost otherwise. Also, strategic hires and 'hard to finds' will always benefit from the involvement of well entrenched agencies as multiple sources are needed to track down the right person.  

Training Time

Training schedules may suffer in the good times. They shouldn't but, let's face it, business travels at warp speed these days and deadlines take priority. But I hear a lot these days about the reinvigoration of QS training programs within firms. There is still a big shortage in the commercially astute, client facing, project adept Senior QS. It's wafer thin in Australia and when the older guard move on, which they are with all these acquisitions, the shortage will be critical. Time to start growing them from within. It's an investment that will bring returns when the market turns and it looks like many firm have adopted this philosophy. 

There is no doubt that times are tough. But there are lots of positive signs that point to an embellishment of the QS service due to the slow market conditions. Through adversity often comes enhancement. 
Written by Adam Walker for the Building Economist